Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 01:03
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Rossendale man 'did not know what was wrong until I got NHS text' - BBC
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Id ea voluptatem rerum temporibus expedita facere.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What do men find attractive in an older woman?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
‘Stick’: Apple’s Golf Comedy Scores on the Charms of Owen Wilson - Rolling Stone
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Water Discovered Around a Young, Sun-Like Star For First Time - ScienceAlert